Radiometric dating has determined that earth is approximately haylie duff and nick zano dating
Thus creationists and others who invoke perceived weaknesses in radiocarbon dating as justification to cast doubt on the great age of the earth are either uniformed on very basic scientific facts, or else are highly being disingenuous to their audience.
Radiocarbon dating has been studied at great length over the past few decades, and its strengths and weaknesses are very well understood at this point in time.
The Bible does not give an age for the Earth, nor is any theological point drawn from the age of the Earth, so it may not be as important as some of the other issues.
Most scientists believe the Earth is about 4.5 billion (4,500,000,000) years old. Some creationists have attempted to reconcile this figure with the creation in Genesis by proposing that the rocky, lifeless planet was created long ago (perhaps 4.5 billion years), and God created life on this planet later (perhaps 6,000 to 10,000 years ago), when it suited His purposes to do so.
For example, the element Uranium exists as one of several isotopes, some of which are unstable.
We know it is accurate because radiometric dating is based on the radioactive decay of unstable isotopes. This is an enormous branch of geochemistry called Geochronology. It is an accurate way to date specific geologic events.Other creationists hold that the planet itself was created during creation week, perhaps early in the first day of creation.
In this case, the entire planet would be about 6,000 to 10,000 years old.By the way, it is important to understand that most rock strata “dates” were actually assigned long before the first use of radioactive age estimating methods in 1911.